Mob Rule in the NBA

April 30th, 2014 sendarama Posted in pro basketball | No Comments »

Midst the near universal acclaim for NBA commissioner Adam Silver’s decision to suspend Donald Sterling “for life” for the racist comments attributed to him in a taped conversation which went viral, it has been overlooked, or at least disregarded, that Sterling’s comments were made in a conversation intended to be private occurring several months ago to a girlfriend who may have been trying to set him up. The taping, without Sterling’s consent, was illegal under California law. You can be sure that at TMZ Sports, the smut-dispensing web site which broke the story, they were exchanging high fives at the water cooler when Silver announced The Decision II.

In the absence of social media, the firestorm which greeted the disclosure of Sterling’s comments last Saturday would have amounted to little more than a campfire. A close reading of Sterling’s comments reveals that they made little sense. Were they the calculated expression of a dedicated racist’s antipathy to blacks, or were they merely the rantings of a delusional octogenarian to an opportunistic ex-lover with an ax to grind? Did GF Vi Stiviano plan to catch Sterling on tape? Did she sell the tape to TMZ? Silver didn’t wait to find the answers before hitting Sterling with the nuclear option.

There were sound reasons for Silver’s rush to judgment, but none of them had to do with fairness. You can find more offensive language than Sterling’s in any country club steam room or Thursday night poker game. Sterling has been a rogue owner for 33 years, combining enough negative personality traits to make Charles Manson blush; but is he any worse a person than Cleveland owner Dan Gilbert (abusive mortgage loan practices), Knicks owner James Dolan (gross incompetence, permitted executive harassment and sexual exploitation), or the Maloof brothers, who ran the Sacramento franchise to the ground?

It’s not as if Sterling was broadcasting his animosity towards blacks in a public forum. In fact, his public face was to be supportive of blacks. He retained Elgin Baylor as his GM for 23 years, hired Doc Rivers as coach, and was the recipient of an NAACP lifetime achievement award for (gulp) humanitarianism. Can you punish a man for his private thoughts? Should we not consider that an 80 year old man who grew up when anti-semitism was rampant and blacks would not be served at lunch counters may lack the sensitivity to be discreet in the age of social media?

Indeed, under the collective bargaining agreement, NBA players may be better protected from disproportionate punishment for indiscretions than was owner Sterling. Kobe Bryant made a public slur against gays, and received a mere slap in the wrist. How many NBA players have committed felonies, failed to make paternity payments, or been charged with DWI’s, and resumed their careers with little or no interruption?

No, Silver trumped any concerns about fairness to preserve league stability, retain sponsorships, and return attention to the playoffs, all of which were in jeopardy after the defections of several Clipper sponsors and very real player threats to walk off the court unless Sterling was severely punished.

Mark Jackson, Golden State coach, encouraged his team not to play last night if the punishment was not sufficient. So many current and former NBA stars chimed that “there was no room for Sterling in the NBA,” you’d think they’d worked in hotel management. The Players Association engaged Sacramento mayor and former NBA great Kevin Johnson to be its lead spokesman on the matter, and Johnson did not miss a sound bite. He appeared before a group which included Kareem Abdul Jabbar, Steve Nash, and other dignitaries to applaud Silver’s decision.

But it took a while for the players to rally around Sterling’s punishment. Only after Silver announced that he would hold a press conference on the Sterling matter did the players bring forth the heavy artillery. Until then, they were content to turn their shirts inside out in protest. From Shaq to JR Smith, the Twitter network buzzed with kudos to Silver for showing Sterling the door. By extending the punishment from the anticipated “indefinite suspension” to “suspension for life,” Silver quieted the crowd and diffused the situation.

While Silver’s power to suspend Sterling for statements “prejudicial or detrimental to the best interests of the league” is clear, he may be on shakier grounds when he attempts to drum up the required three-fourths of owners’ support for a termination of Sterling’s ownership of the Clippers. If widespread scorn over a misdeed or misstatement is the measure for expulsion, rather than the character of the conduct , some of the more rebellious owners may envision themselves in Sterling’s place. Many Knicks fans, for sure, would have voted to terminate Dolan’s Knicks ownership after the 2011 Carmelo Anthony trade.

Silver has been hailed for making a decision consistent with the “cultural diversity“ of the NBA. And cultural diversity is a good thing. But when in obeisance to cultural diversity, a man’s right to be comfortable with his own thoughts is trampled by a social media stampede, that’s a bad thing.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

On Any Given Thursday

March 18th, 2014 sendarama Posted in college basketball | No Comments »

Let’s play the word game.

The NFL coined it, but college basketball best exemplifies it.

It’s what you got when 6-19 Boston College upends 25-0 Syracuse at the Carrier Dome, when lowly Penn State beats Ohio State twice, and when Providence beats Creighton in the Big East conference tournament final seven days after being crushed by the Blue Jays.

It’s in the air when 16-0 Wisconsin and 15-0 Ohio State both lose five of six in Big Ten play before regrouping to land NCAA bids, and when Baylor and Oklahoma State fall to 2-8 and 4-9, respectively, in conference, before making late season surges.

The NFL mandated it, by its inverted draft system and by biased scheduling, but in the college game, it just came naturally.

During NCAA bracket time, which is right now, it’s the word on everybody’s lips. It’s the “P” word. It’s PARITY. You can’t just rely on chalk when completing your grid. You may actually have to know something.

In this year’s bracket, you can make the argument that the three seeds are better than the two seeds and that two of the four seeds – Louisville and Michigan State – have a better chance to win the tournament than three of the one seeds (Florida excluded). Curiously, the NCAA selection committee has underseeded several teams (New Mexico, Oklahoma State, Louisville, Michigan State) and overseeded others (Creighton, UMass, St. Louis).

In the old days, before conference re-alignment, a traditional basketball power in a Big Six conference could win half its games in conference play and be assured of an NCAA bid. Now, because of uneven scheduling in the re-aligned super conferences, one man’s 12-6 may be no more impressive than another’s 9-9. Virginia, for instance, played Duke, North Carolina, Pitt, and Syracuse only once each while fattening up twice on Maryland, Virginia Tech, Notre Dame, and Florida State. The inequality of conference scheduling has forced the NCAA selection committee to place greater weight on other factors – strength of schedule, wins against top 50 opponents, and so-called “bad losses” to teams out of the top 100.

But the selection committee was not consistent in weighing these factors and in balancing recent performance versus year-long body of work. Despite Louisville’s paucity of top 50 wins, how could the committee ignore that it was steamrollering recent opponents? Ditto for resurgent Michigan State, which is healthy for the first time all season and dominated the Big Ten tourney. By way of cop-out, selection committee chairman Ron Wellman cited the “paper-thin” differences involved in seeding teams.

Just six years ago, in 2008, all four number one seeds made it to the Final Four. Now, you can’t tell a number one seed from a four seed. Where did all this parity come from?

Several factors have contributed to the leveling of the playing field in Division 1, notwithstanding the hogging of top freshman prospects by Kentucky and Kansas.

The pool of available talent has expanded. Teams are recruiting outside of the United States. Syracuse’s Tyler Ennis, Michigan’s Nick Stauskas, and Kansas’ Andrew Wiggins all played high school ball in Canada; and New Mexico’s aspiring Lobos feature two Australians in their starting lineup.

Further, liberalization of the transfer rule has allowed players to more freely change teams. At least twenty transfers are playing major roles for NCAA-bound teams , including Arizona ‘s T.J. McConnell, Duke’s Rodney Hood, San Diego State’s Xavier Thames, and Iowa State’s DeAndre Kane.

DeAndre Kane celebrates Cyclone’s Big 12 Tournament Win

Players who stay are improving during their career. Notwithstanding Kentucky’s success in 2012 with one-and-dones Anthony Davis, Michael Kidd -Gilchrist, and Marcus Teague, coaches are coming to realize that bringing in five or six star recruits is not the formula to win championships. A blend of returning veterans is required to be successful. Of the sixteen top-seeded teams, only Arizona and Kansas start more than one freshman.

When Kentucky won in 2012, it relied heavily on the contributions of returning lettermen Terrence Jones, Darius Miller, and Doron Lamb. Starting four or five freshmen the past two years, Kentucky has played erratically and immaturely, losing 22 games. Barring a Wildcat run in this year’s tournament, the John Calipari model has been discredited. The feeling now is that coaches who can maintain continuity in their program have the advantage of fielding wiser, stronger players than high turnover teams in pursuit of the top recruits.

Another big equalizer has been the increasing importance of the three-point shot. A weaker team trailing for the entire game by 10-12 points can narrow the gap quickly by making a few three-balls, as Boston College so notably did against Syracuse. To succeed today, a college team must shoot the three, make the three, and defend the three better than its opponent. Duke and Creighton are living off the three pointer.

Conference play is so grueling, said former Tennessee coach Bruce Pearl, that among the toughest tasks in sports is to win a road game in conference in February. The intensity is heightened during the conference tournaments where teams are meeting for the second or third time in the season, sometimes only a week apart. Teams know each other. “Familiarity breeds contempt,” said Emerson, but in addition, it allows teams to formulate a new defensive approach for the re-match. This makes for even more parity.

Thus, Providence was able to better contain Creighton’s 3-point shooting and Kentucky, in its third try, was able to push Florida to the buzzer in the SEC championship.

The most competitive of the conference tournaments was the Big Twelve’s. It was parity on steroids. Seven of the eight teams in the quarterfinal round made the NCAA tournament. During the regular season, these teams beat each other up. Only Kansas lost less than six games in conference play. Iowa State, the conference tournament winner, was 15-0 outside the conference, and 11-7 in it. After enduring the rigors of conference play, Kansas, Iowa State, Oklahoma State, and even Baylor are capable of making protracted runs in the NCAA tournament.

Number one seeds Florida and Arizona have relatively clear paths to the Final Four, particularly if Kansas’ center prodigy Joel Embiid does not return at full strength from a back injury for the round of eight match with the Gators; but Louisville and Michigan State pose huge obstacles to Wichita State and Virginia progressing beyond the round of sixteen. The pundits are almost uniform in the belief that these upstart number one seeds will fall early to the number fours with the big resumes.

But the Shockers and the Cavaliers did not earn their high ranking by guile and good fortune alone. Both are in the top five of the respected Pomeroy College Basketball Ratings.

“To expect the unexpected shows a thoroughly modern intellect,” wrote Oscar Wilde.

In the topsy-turvy world of bracket completion, it would be wise to heed the words of the Old Aesthete.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Syracuse-Duke Demands an Encore

February 6th, 2014 sendarama Posted in college basketball | No Comments »

There’s no proof that Punxsutawney Phil is a college basketball fan. But after dozing through Sunday’s Superbowl snorefest on Groundhog Day, on the heels of Syracuse’s heart-rending 91-89 OT victory over Duke Saturday night at the Carrier Dome, even a failed meteorologist with little knowledge of hoops would forecast six more weeks of intense college basketball leading to the start of the NCAA tournament on March 18th.

The build-up to the Super Bowl eclipsed interest in Syracuse-Duke. Many a sports fan with an inkling that Duke would be coming to Syracuse February 1st for their first-ever ACC meeting failed to block out the 6:30 start time with the wife and kids or simply forgot about it…… and came to regret it. Because long after the name of Super Bowl MVP Malcolm Smith (who?) is forgotten, this game will be remembered and recounted.

Well before the first tip, there was a sense of the enormity of the event. The opposing coaches – Mike Kryzyzewski and Jim Boeheim – were one, two in NCAA victories all time, 974 and 940, respectively. Though they had met twice before in pre-season tournaments, this was the first regularly scheduled game between the coaches. It would be Syracuse’s signature 2-3 zone defense against Duke’s equally suffocating man-to-man.

The Carrier Dome had been sold out for months. A record crowd for basketball of more than 36,000 was expected. Syracuse, number two in the nation, in its first year in the Atlantic Coast conference, had won 21 straight to start the season, including 7-0 in conference play. Duke, after a slow start, was back to being Duke.

When the defections of Syracuse and Pitt from the Big East to the ACC were first announced in September, 2011, followed by the departures of Notre Dame and Louisville, the predominant reactions were loathing, disgust, and sadness over the dismembering of the Big East. For the sake of cash, historic rivalries honed over the past 35 years were being trashed. The annual Big East tournament, one of college basketball’s great shows, would be diminished. Didn’t anybody remember the epic battles between Syracuse and Georgetown? How about some respect for the conference which produced eleven NCAA teams as recently as 2011?

But after Saturday night, any outcry over the emasculation of the Big East is likely to be muffled. Because as good as the Big East was – and it was very good – no regular season Big East encounter ever produced the drama of Saturday night. “There’s never been one as good as this one,” said Boeheim. If an expanded ACC can produce regular season games like this, it can’t be all bad.

On the way to their classic encounter, both Syracuse and Duke underwent growing pains. Syracuse needed to replace early departer Michael Carter-Williams at point guard, and Duke was experimenting with a new, albeit incredibly talented, front court. After uncharacteristic losses to Notre Dame and Clemson, the Blue Devils plunged to no. 17 in the national ratings.

Appropriately, Pitt served as an appetizer for both teams in advance of Saturday night’s showdown. On January 18th , Syracuse bested the Panthers in a bruising affair which was reminiscent of their Big East wars. You can transplant northern folk to Tobacco Road, but you can’t take the Big East out of Pitt-Syracuse. The Panthers dominated the offensive glass 16-4, outscoring the Orange 19-2 on second-chance points, but the game was in play until the final moments, when Carter-Williams’ replacement, freshman Tyler Ennis, took charge.

Ennis directs traffic against Duke

Exactly 52 weeks after The Hyphenator catapulted to national prominence with a virtuoso performance against then no. 1 Louisville, punctuated by a steal and thunderous driving dunk to provide the winning margin, Ennis calmly weaved his way through the Pittsburgh traffic for two layups, including a lefty floater with 30.6 seconds left which clinched the victory. Twelve of his sixteen points came in the second half.

“He made some of the best plays I’ve seen in a long time,” said Boeheim of Ennis after the Pitt game. “He has a knack for getting to the basket that’s about as good as anybody I’ve ever seen.” That’s tall praise considering that Boeheim has played with or coached Dave Bing, Pearl Washington, and Carmelo Anthony. “He’s Fred Astaire in sneakers,” said Bill Raftery.

Ennis has filled the vacancy created by the flamboyant Carter-Williams with a calmness and stability unfamiliar to Orange fans. Despite its success over the years, Syracuse has traditionally been turnover prone and erratic at the foul line. Carter-Williams himself was a high-risk player. Big leads often melted into nailbiters, or shocking losses. But with Ennis at the helm, late leads are like money in a safe deposit box. Ennis avoids turnovers (4:1 assist-turnover ratio), makes his foul shots (5-6 against Pitt, 8-8 against Duke), and shoots to a high percentage for a point guard (43.6%). He is as efficient as he is conservative.

Duke played its best game of the season at Pitt on Monday January 27th, pulling away for an 80-65 win. The plodding Panthers were overwhelmed by Duke’s 3-point marksmanship. Andre Dawkins, a fifth year senior returning after a year’s absence, led the way with 6 of 7 from beyond the arc.

The Blue Devils’ low national ranking belied their rapid improvement over the past three weeks and the emergence of freshman Jabari Parker, transfer Rodney Hood (Mississippi State), and sophomore Amile Jefferson to form an uber-talented front line. Armed with a quartet of sharpshooters in the back court, Duke was equipped to provide Syracuse its toughest test. And that it did. Despite the disappointing loss, they have the goods to make another run at a national title. All Duke lacks is a big body to protect the rim.

From the get-go, the Game lived up to its billing. Syracuse’s zone and shot blocking ability gave Duke fits. The Devils kept pace with their devastating 3-point shooting. Syracuse exploited its size advantage down low, and put Duke in early foul trouble. The Orange made their first 11 from the charity stripe and led 38-35 at the half.

Everyone played well. For Syracuse, C.J. Fair and Jerami Grant had career highs. Center Rakeem Christmas had a personal best six blocks and ten rebounds. Ennis was his flawless self. Duke had a season best fifteen 3-pointers out of 32 attempts. Parker, Hood, and Jefferson were superb. Tyler Thornton rescued Duke at the 6-minute mark with three 3-pointers in less than two minutes to erase a 7-point Syracuse lead. Rasheed Sulaimon hit two 3-pointers in the final minute including a tying shot at the end of regulation.

In the overtime, with Parker and Jefferson having fouled out, Ennis took advantage of the size mismatch and fed Grant with three perfect entry passes for no-dribble dunks. Two late foul shots by Ennis provided the winning points. Syracuse didn’t beat Duke. It outlasted the Blue Devils.

Were this a boxing match, the public would be crying out for a re-match. But it need not waste its breath. Duke-Syracuse II is scheduled for February 22nd at Cameron Indoor Stadium. Tickets are available from $1069.00.

I have a feeling that wives and children will take a back seat to this one.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Big Apple Blues

December 29th, 2013 sendarama Posted in pro basketball | 2 Comments »

Carmelo Anthony is disappointed

“My bad,” mouthed Andrea Bargnani in the direction of his Knicks teammates who, like Jack Buck, could not believe what they just saw.

As if choreographed for a New York version of the Wave, many of the 19,500 spectators on hand, Knicks players, and countless TV viewers (including this writer), raised their arms to the sky in reaction to Bargnani’s three-point attempt with his team up by 2 points, ten seconds left in overtime, and a fresh shot clock, on December 18th against the Bucks at the Garden.

Naturally, Bargnani missed, and the Bucks sent the game into a second overtime. The Knicks won it but the victory offered little consolation to any Knick fan with a view to the future.

First, there’s Bargnani. Touted as the next Dirk Nowitzki, Bargnani was drafted first overall by Toronto in 2006 out of the Italian League. He loves to hoist the three-ball, and is pretty good at it. But he plays awful defense, and in 2012-2013, became the first 7-footer in NBA history to average more than 28 minutes and fewer than 4 rebounds per game. He’s what you’d call a soft player.

When the Knicks last summer traded their first pick in 2016 and two second rounders to the Raptors to get him, the move was greeted with mass consternation. Why Bargnani? Last year’s Knicks went 54-28, but there was a fool’s gold quality to it. They became over-dependent on prolific scoring by Carmelo Anthony and the 3-point accuracy of the combustible JR Smith. The regular season success felt more like a one-off than a glimpse of glory to come.

The Knicks’ limitations were exposed in the playoffs against Indiana, which out rebounded the New Yorkers by nine boards a game, and dominated the paint. Going into 2013-2014, the Knicks needed additional front court strength and depth to support the injury-prone Tyson Chandler and Amare Stoudamire. They needed to make more defensive stops. They needed to be tougher. The last thing the Knicks needed was another three-point gunner who didn’t rebound or play defense.

The second reason for our dismay over the Bargnani trade was that the Knicks were back to their old tricks of trading first round picks for aging veterans at a time when recent draft picks are turning other teams into contenders.

Now there’s a third reason for not liking the deal – Bargnani’s an idiot.

We knew Bargnani was soft, and that he was not a good fit; but until the Shot, we were not aware of his weak mental component. English is a second language to Barghani so you can’t blame him for resorting to hip-hop to admit responsibility. A well-rendered “my bad” often results in complete exoneration. But not in the NBA, and not before the smart New York crowd, which did not need Bargnani’s plea to know that it had witnessed a bonehead of epic proportions. The “stupidest shot of the season,” said USA Today.

Bench Reacts to Bargnani Shot

The Bargnani episode came in the midst of a horrible start to the season by the Orange and Blue and on the heels of a brainlock by Coach Mike Woodson just two nights before against the Wizards. Woodson failed to call a time out with seven seconds left and the Knicks trailing by one with the ball under their own basket. Predictably, the possession broke down early and ended with an off-balance 40’ heave by Anthony at the buzzer.

Woodson’s failure to act can be written off as a rare mistake by an otherwise competent coach. But the Bargnani Blunder spotlighted the Knicks’ longstanding but shortsighted policy of trading future number one picks for veteran scorers.

When was the last time the Knicks drafted, nurtured, and retained a good, young player?

Since 2002, the Knicks have traded draft picks which became Nene (2002), LeMarcus Aldridge (2006), Joaquin Noah (2007), and Gordon Hayward (2010). In exchange, they got Antonio McDyess, Stephon Marbury, and Eddy Curry. Enough said. Their first pick in the 2014 draft, which is likely to be a high lottery pick in a very talented draft class, was pledged to Denver in the 2011 deal to get Anthony. Toronto owns their 2016 pick for Bargnani. The only reason the Knicks held onto their 2011 and 2013 picks, which became Iman Shumpert and Tim Hardaway, is an NBA rule which prohibits teams from trading away future number one picks in successive years.

David Lee, whom the Knicks drafted number one in 2005, would be the answer to today’s trivia question, but the Knicks let Lee go in 2010 for negligible consideration to clear cap space to pursue Lebron James. Now, Lee averages 18.3 points and 9.8 rebounds/game for ascendant Golden State.

In February 2011, the Knicks traded three of their starting five, promising back-up center Timofey Mosgov, plus the 2014 pick, to Denver for Anthony. How’s that working out? As this columnizer predicted nearly three years ago at the time of the trade, the Knicks are not going to achieve anything during the Anthony reign. Anthony remains a marvelous scorer and is having a good season, but he is not a team leader. When the team languishes, so does he. His public comments are less than inspirational. It was a bad sign before the start of the season when Anthony gratuitously declared his intention to opt out of his contract after this year to test free agency. If he were concerned with team morale, he would have remained silent on the topic. In light of his self-absorption, what chance is there of the championship-less Anthony re-upping with a 30-52 Knick team with a fatally flawed roster and no draft pick?… He’s gone, baby.

The author and executioner of the Knicks’ misguided attempts to build a winner by acquiring big names rather than drafting and developing young talent is their owner, James Dolan. Dolan, 58, is the son of cable czar Charles Dolan. James spent his early adult life battling drug and alcohol problems and an allegedly volatile temper. In 1999, Charles Dolan acquired the Knicks, Rangers, Madison Square Garden, and the MSG network and handed over the entire enterprise to his entirely unqualified son.

Dolan’s reign has been a disaster. He is ill-equipped to make the management decisions that successful franchises require. The Knicks are in the tank and likely to stay there. But across the river Russian billionaire Mikhail Prokhorov, who acquired the New Jersey Nets in 2010 and moved them to Brooklyn, was drinking Dolan’s Kool-Aid.

Perhaps Prokhorov, an accomplished banker, businessman, and politician in Russia, and a self-made man, just could not stand to play second fiddle to the dorky Dolan. Prokhorov seemed more obsessed with surpassing the Knicks than in building a balanced roster. One of his first acts after determining to move to Brooklyn was to take out a 225′ by 99′ billboard directly across from the Garden. He promised a championship within five years.

In his dogged pursuit of big stars, Prokhorov has doled out more draft picks than Dolan.

When Prokhorov missed on getting Carmelo Anthony in 2011, he quickly regrouped and overpaid to get Deron Williams from the Jazz, sacrificing number one picks in 2011 and 2012 for the oft-injured point guard, who was signed only through 2012. Last year, the Nets assumed the bloated contract of fading Joe Johnson in an effort to induce Williams to re-sign. Williams re-upped, but the Nets are paying Johnson 21.5 million in 2013-2014, and are on the hook for another 45 million for the next two years. The Johnson deal is widely considered to be the worst contract in the game. Finally, just prior to the start of this season, the Nets sent their number one picks for 2014, 2016 and 2018 to Boston for Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce.

The Nets thought they had assembled a championship team built around a Big Three of Williams, Garnett and Pierce and a supporting cast of Johnson and Center Brook Lopez. But the trade is beginning to look like the Big Swindle, and not in the Nets’ favor. At 37 and 36, respectively, Garnett and Pierce are slipping. Their numbers are down close to 50% off their career levels. Lopez is out for the season with a foot injury. Williams is batting chronic leg problems. It’s wait ’til next year already for the Brooklyn Bums, I mean Nets.

Pierce and Garnett fail to deliver

The Nets have the biggest payroll in the NBA at 102 million, and the Knicks are second at 89 million. At this writing, their records are 10-20, and 9-21, respectively. It was projected that the teams would contest for Atlantic Division supremacy, not basement occupancy. With both rosters lacking in young talent, no cap room, and not much to be expected from the draft, their futures look as bleak as the present. Sadly for Dolan and Prokhorov, in the NBA, money does not buy happiness.

Dolan and Prokhorov would do well to adopt some of the techniques of their small market competitors,

Where does it say in the NBA by-laws that the owner of a major-market team has to be trigger-happy? Or that patience, character-building, player development, and shrewd trades, are exclusively the province of small or mid-market teams, where there is less pressure to win now and more opportunity to adopt a game plan and stick with it.

It certainly seems that way. Indiana, Oklahoma City, San Antonio, and now Portland and Golden State have relied primarily on home grown talent and draft picks to fuel their hot starts. The Pacers, headed by Larry Bird for most of the past ten years, set the standard for small market success.

The Pacer Way

The Pacers have generally operated out of the lottery but have drafted well in the first round and been patient with their young talent. Recent middle and late first round picks Paul George and Roy Hibbert have improved year to year. George, just 23 but in his fourth year, is an MVP candidate, and 7’3″ Hibbert is the league’s best defensive stopper. Lance Stephenson, branded as a trouble-maker out of college, slipped to the second-round in 2010, but is on the verge of becoming one of the league’s best all-around guards. He’s had three triple doubles already this season.

David West , the lone starter acquired through free agency, is a fierce rebounder and low-post presence. Off the bench is former leading scorer Danny Granger, their number one pick in 2005, who missed last season because of injury. George Hill is a fine, complimentary point guard who was acquired by trade from San Antonio for Kawhi Leonard, the Pacers’ number one pick in 2011. During the off-season, the Pacers reinforced their bench, acquiring inexpensive free agents Luis Scola, Earl Watson, and Chris Copeland.

Shrewd draft picks, strategic trades, patient player development. Nine-deep. Those are the ingredients to Indiana’s team cake. When have we used any of these words to describe the Knicks or Nets?

The Pacers exhibit a character and cohesion which is foreign to the Knicks and the Nets. Hardly any tattoos. No twitter accounts. No bickering among teammates. Perhaps it derives from Bird, who demonstrated a fierce competitiveness as a player and looks for the same qualities in his legions. With a grand vision, he has constructed a team which is built for the long haul.

The paradox is that nobody appreciates a team like the Pacers more than New York fans, who care more for teamwork, team character and balanced scoring than the glitz associated with superstars. They would be willing to wait for the big payoff if there was a reason to be hopeful.

But so long as James Dolan and Mikhail Prokhorov are running the show, hope is as scarce as a number one draft pick.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Say No to Cano

October 23rd, 2013 sendarama Posted in baseball | No Comments »

Entering the off-season, Yankee General Manager Brian Cashman faces decisions which are no less daunting than those faced by Hobson or Sophie.

Having just said farewell to revered Yankee lifers Mariano Rivera and Andy Pettitte (in the exercise of columnist privilege, we will overlook Pettitte’s 3-year stopover in Houston), Cashman must ponder how far he will go to retain free agent second baseman Robinson Cano, who has demanded a ten-year 300 million contract to finish his career in pinstripes.

Cashman’s decision is complicated by the new MLB salary cap rules, which would severely punish the Yanks for exceeding 189 million in payroll for the 2014 season, and by the uncertain status of Alex Rodriguez who may be suspended for all or part of the 2014 season for his involvement with the Biogenesis clinic.

If the arbitrator hearing A-Rod’s case concludes that the 211 game suspension imposed by MLB was justified, or that A-Rod should be set down for 100 games or more, then all or most of A-Rod’s salary comes off the books for 2014 and a Cano signing becomes more likely, particularly if his deal is back-loaded beyond 2014.

But if, as appears probable, the arbitrator’s hearing drags on into the deep winter, or a negotiated resolution with MLB substantially cuts A-Rod’s suspension, then Cashman will get no relief from A-Rod’s predicament.

Eight years into his career, Cano, 31 years old yesterday, is on track to become the most prolific second baseman of the modern era. He is well on his way to surpassing the batting average, home run and rbi totals of Hall of Famers Joe Morgan, Roberto Alomar, and Ryne Sandberg and has a decent shot at reaching Jeff Kent’s record for career home runs by a second baseman (377) and Rogers Hornsby’s lifetime rbi total (1584). He fields his position beautifully and has a rifle for an arm.

Signed by the Yankees as an 18 year old out of the Dominican Republic and raised in their farm system, Cano is poised to join Yankee legends Lou Gehrig, Bill Dickey, Joe Dimaggio, Yogi Berra, Whitey Ford, Mickey Mantle, Derek Jeter, and Rivera, as Hall of Famers who spent their entire major league careers in the Yankee system.

But don’t bet the ranch on it.

What would have been inconceivable during the George Steinbrenner era is a distinct possibility under the management of Cashman and Hank Steinbrenner, George’s more grounded son. Recognizing that the Yanks can be a mediocre team notwithstanding Cano’s brilliance (see 2013) and that their greater need is for young pitching, the Yanks may well determine that they can follow the example set by St. Louis and Boston and allocate the money saved by letting Cano go to stocking young, powerful arms and acquiring 3-4 modestly priced free agents to fill the several holes in their regular lineup.

And that would be the right decision. Because though Cano is a top of the line player, he is a middle of the road teammate.Your highest paid player should set an example for his teammates, but Cano undermines team spirit by his failure to expend maximum effort and by a seemingly lackadaisical attitude. The game comes so easily to him that he appears not to be trying. On grounders to the right side, he lopes lazily to first base. In the field, he waits ’til the last second to throw out the runner. He is simply not programmed to be a team leader.

The Cardinals and the Red Sox have set the template for how to handle moody superstars who demand or receive maximum free agent money. In the case of the Cardinals, they relinquished free agent superstar Albert Pujols to the Angels and received back a draft choice which they used to acquire Michael Wacha, who as a rookie has been the best pitcher in the playoffs. In 2012, the Red Sox cut their losses and traded Josh Beckett, Carl Crawford, and Adrian Gonzalez to the Dodgers, shedding 240 million in payroll in the process, and used the money saved to acquire five middle tier free agents who have played major roles in their march to the World Series.

The Cardinals are almost entirely built from the draft. Five key players on their World Series roster derive from their 2009 draft alone, including two starters (Joe Kelly, Shelby Miller), closer Trevor Rosenthal, lead-off man Matt Carpenter, and clean-up hitter Matt Adams. Beyond Rosenthal, the rest of the bullpen is comprised primarily of rookie pitchers. In Game 2 of the NLCS, a game started by Wacha, 26 of 27 outs were recorded by rookie pitchers, and in the 13-inning Game 1 marathon, 29 of the first 30 outs were registered by rookies. Ace starter Adam Wainwright is also home-grown.

In the early 1990′s, the Yanks’ farm system was strong, giving rise to Jeter, Rivera, Pettitte, Bernie Williams, and Jorge Posada. Not coincidentally, this was during the period of George Steinbrenner’s 2-year suspension from baseball. Twenty years of pursuing high-priced free agents and neglecting the draft cannot be overcome by an overnight change of heart.

But saying no to Cano would be a good place to start.


AddThis Social Bookmark Button